| |
 |
 |
|
| |
Parkers
Ultimate |
Parker's Strike
Zone |
|
|
These are the two balls Parker has used for
most of the week. Most of qualifying has been with the Ultimate
Inferno. There were a couple games he tried to use an original
Inferno but only in a searching manner.
The Ultimate has been the right balance of
power and predictability he is looking for this week. He has
balls that hook more but they get him in a lot more trouble. He
has balls that are smoother but they don't hit as well. At the
end of qualifying Parker was looking for something with a little
more hook potential. We found this Strike Zone in is secondary
arsenal on the truck. We sanded it with 1000 Abralon pad. The
idea was to allow Parker to stay in the same part of the lane
and give him another option if carry became an issue. When we
got down to the lane we saw that he Strike Zone did not roll as
early and reacted stronger down lane but not to a point that it
moved him out of the zone the pattern is asking the players to
attack.
During the five minutes of practice before the
matches began Parker was able to get lined up with both balls so
it gave him closer options than he had during qualifying. At
this point in the tournament Parker is very comfortable with
where and how he is suppose to attack the lane and if one ball
isn't getting through the pins the right way the other one might
be the answer without him having to make more dramatic physical
changes.
The original Inferno is still on the team
along with an Absolute Inferno but it has been demoted to the
3rd team. In the match-play rounds Parker actually used the
Strike Zone almost exclusively. What I liked about his look
during the match-play portion was the strike zone gave him more
mistake room than the Ultimate. The Ultimate allows Parker to
play a tighter line the ball may roll a little early but his
angles match up very well and his light hit carry percentage has
been great. While the Strike Zone allows Parker to play just
inside of the the Ultimate and have a little more confidence
that the ball will make it back if he misses left. Parker is
trying to play the hold the pattern is providing him but it
doesn't hurt to have a little help to the left every now and
then. |
| |
 |
 |
|
| |
Nick Smith |
|
|
For those of you who do not know Nick he is on
Brunswick's Regional staff. He is a Pro Shop operator in California and
a very witty poster on Ballreviews.com. I just thought some of you might
like to get an inside view on Nicks' experiences at the Dick Weber Open.
Nick's week was a real roller coaster ride. I would
walk by to check up on him every now and then and I would see his
numbers change colors as if they were a blinking light. I am sure he is
feeling the same frustration many bowlers are right now. The conditions
they competed on are not anything you can prepare for. I saw some real
upside in Nick's game and don't want him to be too hard on himself. But
here is your opportunity to get back at him for all those witty
comments. Go ahead Verbs, Ric, Robert and others...have fun with it.
As I wander around the center I can't help but hear
bits and pieces of conversations. I thought you might want to get a
little insight on what seems to be the:
Topic of the Day
The topic of the day seems to be the format comparisons. I try and
keep an open mind when I listen. The most obvious thing I notice is the
passion at which people discuss this issue, most discussions sound more
like arguments. It is as if you have to make a choice between one or the
other. Keep one throw the other away...Door number one or Door number
two. Right or wrong. Black or White.
I listen to both sides and question both. Why do you have to have
just one tournament format? We all know variety in lane conditions is
important at this level of bowling. It is ok when conditional bowlers
achieve star status in our sport but we should never let them become the
Icons of our sport. True icons of the sport can compete and win on
anything. The true icons of our sport are very few. There are a lot of
great bowlers when they are on their condition but there are less than a
handful who can win on anything. We all know how important lane
conditions are in the results of a tournament. In my opinion the format
is just as important.
The results of a tournament have as much to do with the format as the
applied patterns. All considerations need to based on the fact that
applied patterns turn into what the field makes of it. The more games
you bowl you have to realize what the field of bowlers are going to do
to the playing surface. Some players understand how to use this to their
advantage other players do not. Who is better? The one who understands
how to use it or the one who doesn't. Is professional bowling about
choosing a particular style and being able to repeat it? Is repetition
all there is about being a Professional bowler. If being a professional
bowler is just about being repetitive there are way more than a handful
of candidates. It is amazing how good bowlers across the world have
become. We have to look beyond the ability to repeat shots to separate
the bowlers.
The only way I know to separate them is to challenge them with
variety and see who is at the top when the smoke clears. I look through
the field of professional bowlers and try and pick who I think would
stand the tallest at the end of a season of true variety. The names are
few but whoever the group of bowlers are they are the true Icons of our
sport. I see opportunity not an argument between what is right and
wrong.
Why not take the number of tournaments we have right now and make
every fourth one of them an open long format tournament in a different
region across the country. That would give the PBA, the players and the
fans an opportunity to expand the variety. That would be 7 or so
tournaments a year that would be open to anybody wanting to challenge
their skills against the world's greatest bowlers. The PBA would have 7
tournaments with a larger number of entries. To the players it gives
every bowler wanting the challenge an opportunity, To the fans it gives
them a greater opportunity to see more than one day of all the bowlers.
To me I just see the variety.
This week is an opportunity to expand the variety the PBA needs in
its desire to bring respectability and recognition to the true icons of
our sport. This week we are seeing a truly different pattern, and some
more variety in the format. I hope when everybody sits down and begins
to strategize they don't get caught up in the same passionate right vs
left, black vs white, old vs new arguments I heard this week. Without
variety we will have conditional superstars being presented as Icons of
our sport.
The PBA Dick Weber Open can be a fork in the road to greater PBA
success or just another U-turn that leads us back to where we came from.
|